Web Letters: The Protect Alberto Gonzales Act of 2007

diary of a mad law professor

By Patricia J. Williams

This article appeared in the August 27, 2007 edition of The Nation.

August 9, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Here's an idea that may or may not put a monkey wrench in their Orwellian plans (don't know enough about IT to say for sure): How about a national campaign involving millions of people who start using flagged words and phrases in every e-mail and conversation they can--tens of millions of phone calls, text messages and e-mails daily for the software to sort through, so much that if it doesn't crash the system, it might at least make the human intelligence process too time-consuming and therefore worthless?

    Steve McGaughey

    Champaign, IL

    08/13/2007 @ 1:33pm


  • When fear is used as the exclusive rationale for policies that exceed our own principles of democracy, then we experience an erosion of what we were founded upon and passionately believe in--freedom. There is no justification for circumventing checks and balances and judicial oversight. Passively like sheep and attention diverted with other worries, we all watch with confusion as such deeply important issues become laws without the analysis they deserve and explanation that we deserve.

    Rochelle Cisneros

    Cocoa Beach, FL

    08/12/2007 @ 09:44am


  • President Bush claimed that the terrorists hate our freedom, our democracy, our rights and our liberty.

    As a devoted anti-terrorist Administration, the White House is committed to reducing the risk of the terrorist attacks by shrinking our freedom, our democracy, our rights and our liberty.

    The less of it we have, the less hateful the terrorists are and the less exposed we are.

    It is indeed a brilliant strategy. And they say that Mr. Bush is not willing to compromise.

    The President doesn’t like it either, but he is doing it to protect us.

    Kenan Porobic

    Charlotte, NC

    08/10/2007 @ 10:49am


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Capitolism

Geoghegan | A visionary progressive runs for congress
Christopher Hayes

» State of Change

Not A Great Day for Senate Democrats | Majority Leader Reid needs to do a better job of leadering.
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

Panetta? Ummmmm... Well..... | Could Obama have made a weirder choice for CIA director? Here's why Panetta is doomed.
Robert Dreyfuss

» The Beat

Franken Named Minnesota Winner | Board says DFL candidate prevailed by 225 votes over GOP incumbent Coleman.
John Nichols

» Act Now!

Allow Media into Gaza | Israel is encouraging abuses by preventing foreign journalists from entering the Gaza Strip.
Peter Rothberg

» Editor's Cut

A Trillion Dollar Recovery | We don't need a stimulus, we need a recovery. And that means investing $1 trillion over the next two years.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Notion

Hard Times Without Studs | One of Terkel’s former book editors considers a Studs-less world.
Tom Engelhardt

» And Another Thing

Bill Ayers Whitewashes History, Again | The Weathermen were not just a bunch of idealistic young people.
Katha Pollitt